Автор работы: Пользователь скрыл имя, 19 Апреля 2010 в 18:49, Не определен
Introduction 3
Theory 4
Overview of the company 5
Main parameters of activity 6
Comparison balance sheet for 3 years 9
Horizontal analysis of balance sheet for 2004 10
Vertical analysis of balance sheet for 2004 11
Notes to analysis of balance sheet for 2004 12
Horizontal analysis of balance sheet for 2005 13
Vertical analysis of balance sheet for 2005 14
Notes to analysis of balance sheet for 2005 15
Horizontal analysis of balance sheet for 2006 16
Vertical analysis of balance sheet for 2006 17
Notes to analysis of balance sheet for 2006 18
Horizontal analysis of income statement for 2006/2005 19
Vertical analysis of income statement for 2006/2005 20
Horizontal analysis of income statement for 2005/2004 21
Vertical analysis of income statement for 2005/2004 22
Notes to analysis of income statement 23
Analysis of financial ratios 24
Analysis of financial condition 24
Analysis of bankruptcy opportunity 25
Analysis of financial stability 26
Analysis of business activity 27
Analysis of profitability 27
Conclusion 28
References 29
Notes
to analysis of income statement
As seen from the tables above OJSC “Kazanorgsintez” has been experiencing annual growth of revenues during the last years. In 2005 this entry increased by 13,07%, and in 2006 – by 16,42%. This may be explained by the fact that the company is following a planned politics of increasing the nomenclature of its production and, therefore, the expanding its sales market.
However, with the growth
of revenues the growth of cost of goods, services, and sales is seen
as well. This entry changed by 15,81% in 2005 and by 18,15% in 2006.
Certainly, in this situation we can see that the profits of the company are constantly growing as well, but its growth is not that reasonable.
The vertical analysis shows that there were no sever changes in the structure of the Income statement. The main entries of the statement are administrative expenses and other operating expenses. It is worth mentioning that there was a significant change exactly on the other operating expenses entry in 2005, but it is mainly caused by the changes in accounting politics of the company.
Analysis of financial ratios
Ratio | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Own current capital | 2 018 592 | -722 349 | -9 149 963 |
Own current capital and long-term liabilities | 2 129 660 | 4 324 912 | 3 264 585 |
Inventories and expenses | 2 090 400 | 3 024 469 | 3 587 175 |
Financial ratio 1 | -71 808 | -3 746 818 | -12 737 138 |
Financial ratio 2 | 39 260 | 1 300 443 | -322 590 |
Own current capital (OCC)
An absolute parameter,
which is calculated as a difference between shareholder’s equity and
fixed assets. Increase of OCC in dynamics
is positive tendency, decrease –
negative tendency.
OCC
= Shareholder’s equity – Fixed assets
As seen in the table,
dynamics of this ratio in “Kazanorgsintez” is negative. Furthermore,
we can see that this ratio even goes below zero. This means that the
company has a shortage of own current capital, so the shareholder’s
equity is not enough for financing fixed assets.
Own current capital and long-term liabilities (OCCLTL)
It is calculated
as a difference between shareholder’s equity plus long-term liabilities
and fixed assets. It is an absolute
parameter which characterizes the presence
and amount of own current capital, which a company has, but which (unlike
short-term liabilities) are not available at any time.
OCCLTL =
OCC + Long-term liabilites
Inventories and expenses (IAE)
An absolute parameter,
which shows whether a company has inventories and expenses in progress
for conducting normal financial and economical activities.
IAE = Inventories
+ VAT
Financial ratio
1 (F1)
F1 = OCC – IAE
Shows whether OCC
is enough for financing IAE
Financial ration
2 (F2)
F2 = OCCLTL – IAE
Shows whether OCCLTL
is enough for financing IAE
The analysis of financial ratios F1 and F2 shows that the financial condition of the company may be called as sound. However, the fact that F2 went below zero in 2006 indicates that problems may arise.
Ratio | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Current ratio | 2,79 | 3,14 | 1,72 |
Own capital security ratio | 0,61 | -0,11 | -1,17 |
Solvency recovery ratio | 1,59 | 1,86 | 0,79 |
Current ratio (R1)
Measures whether
or not a company has enough resources to conduct economical activity
and pay its debts in the next 12 months.
Own capital security ratio (R2)
Characterizes
whether or not a company has enough own capital for financial stability.
As K1<2 and K2<0.1
(which are normative ratios), we calculate the solvency recovery ratio
(R3) for the 6 months period.
Solvency recovery ratio (R3)
It shows whether
or not a company has the ability to recover its solvency in a certain
period of time (6 months).
If R3 is over 1, this
indicates that the company has the real ability to recover its solvency.
An in contrast, if R3 is less than 1, than the company doesn’t have
the real ability to recover its solvency in near future.
Ratio | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Autonomy ratio (R5) | 0,86 | 0,57 | 0,40 |
Financial dependence ratio (R6) | 0,14 | 0,43 | 0,60 |
Equity and liabilities ratio (R7) | 0,17 | 0,76 | 1,53 |
Autonomy ratio (R5)
It
characterizes the part of owners of
the company in the whole amount of
capital used in financial and economical
activities.
The decrease of R5
means that the company becomes less financially stable and more dependent
from external credits.
Financial dependence ratio (R6)
Characterizes
the part of total liabilities in the
total amount of assets used in financial and economical
activity.
The growth of R6 means
the growth of borrowed capital for financing the enterprise.
Equity and liabilities ratio (R7)
Gives the most complete
overview of the financial stability of a company. Its
value, for example 0.17, means that for each ruble of own capital in
total assets there are 0.17 rubles of borrowed capital.
The growth of R7 shows that the company is becoming more dependent from external credit and investors, and therefore, that the financial stability is falling.
The business activity
of the company characterizes the efficiency of the current activities
and is connected with the effectiveness of using material, labour, and
financial resources of the company, as well as with the turnover ratios.
Ratio | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Productivity of work | 1669,4 | 1752,2 | 1922,4 |
Working capital turnover | 5,54 | 3,08 | 4,75 |
Shareholder’s equity turnover | 2,08 | 1,34 | 0,77 |
Asset turnover | 1,31 | 0,82 | 0,55 |
Stock turnover | 6,28 | 5,35 | 4,28 |
Accounts receivable turnover | 39 | 99 | 86 |
One of the most important
results of company’s activity for the current period is the profitability
ratio, which is calculated as a quotient of received profits and expenses
on gaining these profits.
Ratio | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Sales profitability, % | 16,81 | 15,02 | 14,24 |
Shareholder’s equity profitability, % | 25,81 | 21,63 | 19,86 |
Conclusion
Based on conducted
analysis several conclusions can be made. OJSC “Kazanorgsintez”
has been developing constantly and actively for the last three years:
construction of new plants is organized, and as a result in future we
will be able to see a wider range of production nomenclature and sales
market. Also an annual growth of revenues and profits is shown by the
company.
Nevertheless, some
negative tendencies are presented as well. A huge amount of borrowed
capital has been taken by the company to build those new plants. And
therefore the financial independence of the company is in danger. Expenses
of the company are in the negative area as well, because these expenses
are growing in larger percentage than the gained revenues.
Thus, to make a conclusion
of all the above, we can say, that OJSC “Kazanorgsintez” is a prospective
company, although they need to have a strict control over their financial
flows to save their stability.
References
Информация о работе Financial analysis of annual reports of “KazanOrgSintez”