Chapter II Stylistic analysis

Автор работы: Пользователь скрыл имя, 14 Сентября 2011 в 20:12, курсовая работа

Описание работы

Stylistics is the study of varieties of language whose properties position that language in context, and tries to establish principles capable of accounting for the particular choices made by individuals and social groups in their use of language. A variety, in this sense, is a situationally distinctive use of language. For example, the language of advertising, politics, religion, individual authors, etc., or the language of a period in time, all are used distinctively and belong in a particular situation. In other words, they all have ‘place’ or are said to use a particular 'style'.

Содержание работы

Introduction 3

Chapter I Theoretical assumptions of stylistics

1.1. Definition of style in works of different linguists 5

1.2. The various approaches to the study of stylistics 7

1.2.1. Linguistic stylistics

1.2.2. Literary stylistics

1.2.3. Functional stylistics 22

1.3. Problem of image-creation in fiction texts

Conclusion on chapter 1 33

Chapter II Stylistic analysis

2.1. The revelation of the ways of image-creation in fiction texts

2.1.1. The stylistic analysis of “The Selfish Giant” by Oscar Wilde

2.1.2. Stylistic analysis of “Louise” by William Somerset Maugham 49

2.2.

Conclusion on chapter 2 53

General conclusion 54

Bibliography 55

Appendix

Файлы: 1 файл

диплом.doc

— 184.50 Кб (Скачать файл)

     Stylistic analysis is practiced as a part of understanding the possible meanings in a text. It is a useful discipline which encourages logical and creative thought and can be transferred to many other areas of academic study, such as discourse analysis or critical reading. The fact that stylistic analysis can be applied to a large variety of texts, as shown above, makes it a useful and important discipline.

     Stylistic analysis is practiced as a part of understanding the possible meanings in a text. It is a useful discipline which encourages logical and creative thought and can be transferred to many other areas of academic study, such as discourse analysis or critical reading. The fact that stylistic analysis can be applied to a large variety of texts, as shown above, makes it a useful and important discipline. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

     General Conclusion

     As is obvious from the names of the branches or types of stylistic studies this science is very closely linked to the linguistic disciplines philology students are familiar with: phonetics, lexicology and grammar due to the common study source. The term semantics is also widely used in linguistics in relation to verbal meanings. Meaning is not attached to the level of the word only, or for that matter to one level at all but correlates with all of them—morphemes, words, phrases or texts. This is one of the most challenging areas of research since practically all stylistic effects are based on the interplay between different kinds of meaning on different levels. Suffice it to say that there are numerous types of linguistic meanings attached to linguistic units, such as grammatical, lexical, logical, denotative, connotative, emotive, evaluative, expressive and stylistic. The theory of functional styles investigates the structure of the national linguistic space—what constitutes the literary language, the sublanguages and dialects mentioned more than once already. Literary stylistics will inevitably overlap with areas of literary studies such as the theory of imagery, literary genres, the art of composition, etc. Decoding stylistics in many ways borders culture studies in the broad sense of that word including the history of art, aesthetic trends and even information theory. As in many other aspects of life the situation changed in a language policy. That requires creation of new textbooks, dictionaries, manuals. In order to fulfill this goals one must know every field of linguistics. In my opinion the theme of the work is very actual because there is not any works which  give full description of literary stilistic. Main goal of the work is to compare, analyze and find examples which belong to literary stylistic. The practical value of the research is that the material and the results of the given qualification work can serve the material for theoretical courses of lexicology , stylistics, typology as well as can be used for practical lessons in translations, home reading ,conversational practice and current events. 
 

     Bibliography 

     
  1. Арнольд И.В. Стилистика. Современный английский язык: Учебник для вузов. – М.: Флинта: Наука, 2002.
  2. Бабенко Л.Г., Казарин Ю.В. Лингвистический анализ художественного текста. – М.: Флинта: Наука, 2005., 496 с.
  3. Гальперин И.Р. Стилистика английского языка, М.: 1971., 342 с.
  4. Гальперин И.Р. Текст как объект лингвистического исследования.  2004.
  5. Гуревич В.В. Стилистика английского языка. – М.: Флинта: Наука, 2009., 72 с.
  6. Есин А.Б. Принципы и приемы анализа литературного произведения. – М.: Флинта: Наука, 2000., 248 с.
  7. Косоножкина Л.В. Практическая стилистика английского языка. – М.: ИКЦ «МарТ», 2004. – 192 с.
  8. Кухаренко В.А. Практикум по стилистике английского языка. – М.: Флинта: Наука, 2011. – 184 с.
  9. Нуриахметова Ю. М. Стилистика английского языка.Уфа, РИЦ, БашГУ. 2010. 30 с.
  10. Охримович К.В. Практикум по лингвистической стилистике английского языка. – Уфа, РИЦ БашГУ, 2007., 108 с.
  11. Потебня: Мысль и язык. 1905, 204
  12. Разинкина Н.М. Функциональная стилистика. – М.: Высшая школа, 2004., 271 с.
  13. Разинкина Н.М. Практикум по стилистике английского и русского языков. – М.: Высшая школа, 2006. – 336 с.
  14. Скребнев Ю.М. Основы стилистики английского языка: Учебник для вузов (на английском языке). – М.: Астрель; Аст, 2000.
  15. Сулейманова О.А., Беклемешева Н.Н., Карданова К.С. Стилистические аспекты перевода. – М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 2010. – 176 с.
  16. Archibald: 1978,54
  17. Baggett D., Klein S.E. “Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts”: Chicago and La Salle, Illinois, OPEN COURT, 2005. - 243 pp
  18. Bradbury M. the Modern British Novel”: London, Penguin Books, 2001. – 622 pp.
  19. Richard Bradford. 1997. Stylistics (London and New York: Routledge)
  20. Ball, Catherine N.: Automated Text Analysis. Cautionary Tales. In: Literary and Linguistic Computing.,1994, pp. 293-302.
  21. Bloom, Harold: The Western Canon. The Books and Schools of the Ages. New York: Riverhead 1994.
  22. Burrows, John F.: A Computation Into Criticism. A Study of Jane Austen's Novels and an Experiment in Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1987.
  23. Butler, Judith: Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge, 1990.
  24. Harold Bloom: The Western Canon. The Books and Schools of the Ages. New York: Riverhead 1994, p. 15.
  25. Byatt A. S. The Matisse stories: Londong, Vinatage, 1994 – 135 pp
  26. Chatman: A Functional Lingustic 1967,30
  27. Crystal : Stylistic.1969,21
  28. Thomas Corns: Computers in the Humanities. Methods and Applications in the Study of English Literature. In: Literary and Linguistic Computing 6/2 (1991), pp. 127-130. Here p. 129.
  29. David Crystal. 1998. Language Play (London: Penguin)
  30. Cf. Catherine N. Ball: Automated Text Analysis. Cautionary Tales. In: Literary and Linguistic Computing 9 (1994), pp. 293-302.
  31. Daily Mail, Friday, September 1, 2006 Daily Mail, Thursday, October 19, 2006 
  32. De Groot: Practical Stylistics.1985. 295
  33. Fowler. . Language in Literature: An Introduction to Stylistics 1996, 185
  34. Galsworthy J. “The silver spoon”. -  M.; Издательство «Менеджер», 2000. – 320 с.
  35. Golding W. The Lord of the Flies. – New York: A Perigee Book, 2006. – 208 p. Grisham J. The Firm: New York, Island books, 1992. – 501 pp
  36. Guy Cook. 1994. Discourse and Literature: the Interplay of Form and Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
  37. John Donne, ‘The Sun Rising’, Poems (1633)
  38. Joseph Williams. 2007. Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace, 9th edition (New York: Pearson Longman)
  39. Brian Lamont. 2005. First Impressions (Edinburgh: Penbury Press)
  40. Hill, Archibald A. Poetry and Stylistics.—in; “Essays in Literary Linguistics”, p.54
  41. Geoffrey Leech and Michael H. Short. 1981. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (London: Longman)
  42. Susan Hockey: Electronic Texts in the Humanities, p. 66. (footnote 5).
  43.   M. Koppel et al.: Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. (footnote 22). <http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~koppel/male-female-llc-final.pdf> (27.1.2004) »8. Conclusions«.
  44. William Somerset Maugham : “Louise” ,1926.
  45. A.McIntosh and P.Simpson. 1964. The Linguistic Science and Language Teaching (London: Longman)
  46. Alex Preminger/Terry V. F. Brogan (Eds.): The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1993, p. 404-407.
  47. Adrian Pilkington. 1991. ‘Poetic Effects’, Literary Pragmatics, ed. Roger Sell (London: Routledge)
  48. Roger Fowler. 1996. Linguistic Criticism, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
  49. Robey, David: Round Table on New Directions in Humanities Computing. In: ALLC/ACH 2002. New Directions in Humanities Computing. Conference Abstracts. Tübingen: ZDV 2002, pp. 106-109.
  50. Rockwell, Geoffrey: What is Text Analysis, Really? In: Literary and Linguistic Computing 18/2 (2003), pp. 209-219.
  51. Rommel, Thomas: »And trace it in this poem every line.« Methoden und Verfahren computerunterstützter Textanalyse am Beispiel von Lord Byrons Don Juan. (Tübinger Beiträge zur Anglistik; 15). Tübingen: Narr 1995.
  52. Rommel, Thomas: The Internet Survey for English Studies. In: Doris Feldmann/Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann/Thomas Rommel (Eds.): Anglistik im Internet. Proceedings of the 1996 Erfurt Conference on Computing in the Humanities. Heidelberg: Carl Winter 1997, pp. 101-112
  53. Thomas A. Sebeok. 1960. Style in Language (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
  54. Simkins-Bullock, Jennifer A./Wildman, Beth G.: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Gender and Language. In: Sex Roles, 24, 3/4 (1991), pp. 149-160.
  55. Smith, J. B.: Computer Criticism. In: Roseanne G. Potter (Ed.): Literary Computing and Literary Criticism. Theoretical and Practical Essays on Theme and Rhetoric. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1989, p. 13-44.
  56. Sutherland, Kathryn: Introduction. In: Kathryn Sutherland (Ed.): The Electronic Text. Investigations in Method and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997, p. 1-18 
  57. Werner. Context and Language: A Functional Lingustic Theory of Register 1967,324
  58. William Downes. 1998. Language and Society, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  59. Katie Wales. 2001. A Dictionary of Stylistics, 2nd edition, (Harlow: Longman)
  60. Widdowson. 1992. Practical Stylistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
  61. Xu Youzhi. Terms of use. 2005.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

     Appendix

     Somerset Maugham "Louise"

            I could never understand why Louise bothered with me. She disliked me and I knew that behind my back she seldom lost the opportunity of saying a disagreeable thing about me. She had too much delicacy ever to make a direct statement, but with a hint and a sigh and a little gesture of her beautiful hands she was able to make her meaning plain. It was true that we had known one another almost intimately for five and twenty years, but it was impossible for me to believe that this fact meant much to her. She thought me a brutal, cynical and

     vulgar fellow. I was puzzled at her not leaving me alone.' She did nothing of the kind; indeed, she was constantly asking me to lunch and dine with her and once or twice a year invited me to spend a week-end at her house in the country. Perhaps she knew that I alone saw her face behind the mask and she hoped that sooner or later I too should take the mask for the face.

            I knew Louise before she married. She was then a frail, delicate girl with large and melancholy eyes. Her father and mother adored and worshipped her, for some illness, scarlet fever I think, had left her with a weak heart and she had to take the greatest care of herself. When Tom Maitland proposed to her they were dismayed, for they were convinced that she was much too delicate for marriage. But they were not too well off and Tom Maitland was rich. He promised to do everything in the world for Louise and finally they entrusted her to him. Tom Maitland was a big strong fellow, very good-looking and a fine athlete. He adored Louise. With her weak heart he could not hope to keep her with him long and he made up his mind to do everything he could to make her few years on earth happy. He gave up the games he played excellently, not because she wished him to, but because it so happened that she always had a heart attack whenever he was going to leave her for a day. If they had a difference of opinion she gave in to him at once for she was the most gentle wife a man could have, but her heart failed her and she would stay in bed, sweet and uncomplaining, for a week. He could not be such a brute as to cross her.

            On one occasion seeing her walk eight miles on an expedition that she especially wanted to make, I remarked to Tom Maitland that she was stronger than one would have thought. He shook his head and sighed.

            "No, no, she's dreadfully delicate. She's been to all the best heart specialists in the world and they all say that her life hangs on a thread. But she has a wonderfully strong spirit."        He told her that I had remarked on her endurance.

            "I shall pay for it tomorrow," she said to me in her melancholy way. "I shall be at death's door."

            "I sometimes think that you're quite strong enough to do the things you want to," I murmured.

            I had noticed that if a party was amusing she could dance till five in the morning, but if it was dull she felt very poorly' and Tom had to take her home early. I am afraid she did not like my reply, for though she gave me a sad little smile I saw no amusement in her large blue eyes.

            "You can't expect me to fall down dead just to please you," she answered.

            Louise outlived her husband. He caught his death of cold one day when they were sailing and Louise needed all the rugs there were to keep her warm. He left her a comfortable fortune and a daughter. Louise was inconsolable. It was wonderful that she managed to survive the shock. Her friends expected her speedily to follow poor Tom Maitland to the grave. Indeed they already felt dreadfully sorry for Iris, her daughter, who would be left an orphan. They redoubled their attentions towards Louise. They would not let her stir a finger; they insisted on doing everything in the world to save her trouble. They had to, because if it was necessary for her to do anything tiresome or unpleasant her heart failed her and she was at death's door. She was quite lost without a man to take care of her, she said, and she did not know how, with her delicate health, she was going to bring up her dear Iris. Her friends asked her why she did not marry again. Oh, with her heart it was out of the question, she answered.

            A year after Tom's death, however, she allowed George Hobhouse to lead her to the altar. He was a fine fellow and he was not at all badly off. I never saw anyone so grateful as he for the privilege of being allowed to take care of this frail little thing.

            "I shan't live to trouble you long," she said.

            He was a soldier and an ambitious one, but he threw up his career. Louise's health forced her to spend the winter at Monte Carlo and the summer at Deauville. He prepared to make his wife's last few years as happy as he could.

            "It can't be very long now," she said. "I'll try not to be troublesome."

            For the next two or three years Louise managed, in spite of her weak heart, to go beautifully dressed to all the most lively parties, to gamble very heavily, to dance and even to flirt with tall slim young men. But George Hobhouse had not the strength of Louise's first husband and he had to brace himself now and then with a drink for his day's work as Louise's second husband. It is possible that the habit would have grown on him, which Louise would not have liked at all, but very fortunately (for her) the war broke out. He rejoined his regiment and three months later was killed. It was a great shock to Louise. She felt, however, that in such a crisis she must not give way to a private grief; and if she had a heart attack nobody heard of it. In order to distract her mind she turned her villa at Monte Carlo into a hospital for convalescent officers. Her friends told her that she would never survive the strain.

            "Of course it will kill me," she said, "I know that. But what does it matter? I must do my bit."

            It didn't kill her. She had the time of her life. There was no convalescent home in France that was more popular. I met her by chance in Paris. She was lunching at a restaurant with a tall and very handsome young Frenchman. She explained that she was there on business connected with the hospital. She told me that the officers were very charming to her. They knew how delicate she was and they wouldn't let her do a single thing. They took care of her, well - as though they were all her husbands. She sighed.

            "Poor George, who would ever have thought5 that I with my heart should survive him?"

            "And poor Tom!" I said.

            I don't know why she didn't like my saying that. She gave me her melancholy smile and her beautiful eyes filled with tears.

            "You always speak as though you grudged me the few years that I can expect to live."

            "By the way, your heart's much better, isn't it?"

            "It'll never be better. I saw a specialist this morning and he said I must be prepared for the worst."

            "Oh, well, you've been prepared for that for nearly twenty years now, haven't you?"

            When the war came to an end Louise settled in London. She was now a woman of over forty, thin and frail still, with large eyes and pale cheeks, but she did not look a day more than twenty-five. Iris, who had been at school and was now grown up, came to live with her.

            "She'll take care of me," said Louise. "Of course it'll be hard on her to live with such a great invalid as I am, but it can only be for such a little while, I'm sure she won't mind."

            Iris was a nice girl. She had been brought up with the knowledge that her mother's health was very weak. As a child she had never been allowed to make a noise. She had always realized that her mother must on no account be upset. And though Louise told her now that she would not hear of her sacrificing herself for a tiresome old woman the girl simply would not listen.

            With a sigh her mother let her do a great deal.

            "It pleases the child to think she's making herself useful," she said.

            "Don't you think she ought to go out more?" I asked.

            "That's what I'm always telling her. I can't get her to enjoy herself. Heaven knows, I never want anyone to give up their pleasures on my account."

            And Iris, when I talked to her about it, said: "Poor dear mother, she wants me to go and stay with friends and go to parties, but the moment I start off anywhere she has one other heart attacks, so I much prefer to stay at home."

            But presently she fell in love. A young friend of mine, a very good lad, asked her to marry him and she consented. I liked the child and was glad that she would be given at last the chance to lead a life of her own. But one day the young man came to me in great distress and told me that the marriage was postponed for an indefinite time. Iris felt that she could not desert her mother. Of course it was really no business of mine, but I made the opportunity to go and see Louise. She was always glad to receive her friends at teatime.

            "Well, I hear that Iris isn't going to be married," I said after a while.

            "I don't know about that. She's not going to be married as soon as I wished. I've begged her on my bended knees not to consider me, but she absolutely refuses to leave me."

            "Don't you think it's rather hard on her?"

            "Dreadfully. Of course it can only be for a few months, but I hate the thought of anyone sacrificing themselves for me."

            "My dear Louise, you've buried two husbands, I can't see why you shouldn't bury at least two more."

            "Oh, I know, I know what you've always thought of me. You've never believed that I had anything the matter with me, have you?"

            I looked at her full and square.

            "Never. I think you've carried out a bluff for twenty-five years. I think you're the most selfish and monstrous woman I have ever known. You ruined the lives of those two unhappy men you married and now you're going to ruin the life of your daughter."

            I should not have been surprised if Louise had had a heart attack then.I fully expected her to fly into a passion. She only gave me a gentle smile.

            "My poor friend, one of these days you'll be so dreadfully sorry you said this to me."

            "Have you quite decided that Iris shall not marry this boy?"

            "I've begged her to marry him. I know it'll kill me, but I don't mind. Nobody cares for me. I'm just a burden to everybody."

            "Did you tell her it would kill you?"

            "She made me."

            "Nobody can make you do anything that you yourself don't want to do."

            "She can marry her young man tomorrow if she likes. If it kills me, it kills me."

            "Well, let's risk it, shall we?"

            "Haven't you got any pity for me?"

            "One can't pity anyone who amuses one as much as you amuse me," I answered.

            A spot of colour appeared on Louise's pale cheeks and though she smiled her eyes were hard and angry.

            "Iris shall marry in a month's time," she said, "and if anything happens to me I hope you and she will be able to forgive yourselves."

            Louise was as good as her word. A date was fixed, a rich trousseau was ordered, and invitations were sent. Iris and the lad were very happy. On the wedding-day, at ten o'clock in the morning, Louise, that devilish woman, had one of her heart attacks — and died. She died gently forgiving Iris for having killed her. 

Информация о работе Chapter II Stylistic analysis